GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and Sabre Gold Mines Corp. (SGLD.TO).
GOLD.AS is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. It was launched on May 21, 2019.
Performance
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | 6.85% | 64.94% | 26.36% | 13.35% | -0.13% | -4.09% | 24.31% | 18.40% |
SGLD.TO Sabre Gold Mines Corp. | 0.00% | 38.37% | 5.26% | -15.77% | -77.34% | -49.63% | -4.80% | -2.79% |
Different Trading Currencies
GOLD.AS is traded in USD, while SGLD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SGLD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
GOLD.AS
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 21.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLD.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD.AS
SGLD.TO
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) and Sabre Gold Mines Corp. (SGLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOLD.AS | SGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLD.AS | SGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD.AS and SGLD.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOLD.AS nor SGLD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD.AS | SGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility
GOLD.AS vs. SGLD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD.AS | SGLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.73% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | — | — |