GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L).

GLTP.L and XLKQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Mar 18, 2019. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both GLTP.L and XLKQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist	-1.33%	5.35%	-4.39%	3.50%	-24.95%	-5.40%	8.70%	3.59%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	-7.67%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	22.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTP.L achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's -7.67% return.

GLTP.L

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 0.21%
• 5Y*: -4.73%
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -7.67%
• 6M: -5.59%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 25.65%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: 23.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLKQ.L

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc

GLTP.L

Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTP.L

GLTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GLTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GLTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GLTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.17	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	1.72	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.23	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	1.59	-1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	4.30	-2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTP.L and XLKQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	1.17	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	0.90	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	1.19	-1.46

Correlation

The correlation between GLTP.L and XLKQ.L is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

GLTP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist	4.49%	4.39%	4.33%	3.24%	1.62%	0.81%	0.81%	0.72%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTP.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.02%	-28.74%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.87%	-16.76%	+11.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.89%	-28.74%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.37%	-13.73%	-14.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.45%	-5.08%	-13.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	6.21%	-4.76%

Volatility

GLTP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) is 2.90%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that GLTP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTP.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	5.24%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.32%	14.59%	-10.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.47%	23.32%	-16.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	21.93%	-11.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.28%	21.55%	-11.27%