PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L).

GLT5.L and ERNS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLT5.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Mar 18, 2019. ERNS.L is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 16, 2013.

Performance

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist		-0.37%5.31%2.14%3.86%-5.44%-1.89%1.83%0.69%
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)		0.77%4.84%5.54%4.76%1.54%0.13%0.77%0.76%
Different Trading Currencies

GLT5.L is traded in GBp, while ERNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLT5.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than ERNS.L's 0.77% return.

GLT5.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
1.26%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
—

ERNS.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.77%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist

iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)

Often compared with GLT5.L:
GLT5.L vs. IGLT.LGLT5.L vs. GILS.LGLT5.L vs. GLTA.LGLT5.L vs. FLO5.LGLT5.L vs. UKG5.LGLT5.L vs. CE31.LGLT5.L vs. GIL5.L
Often compared with ERNS.L:
ERNS.L vs. CSH2.LERNS.L vs. IGLT.LERNS.L vs. ICSHERNS.L vs. TI5G.LERNS.L vs. CEMBERNS.L vs. IHG.LERNS.L vs. VOC

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLT5.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ERNS.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLT5.L
GLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GLT5.LERNS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

5.39

-4.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

9.29

-7.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

2.44

-1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

23.48

-21.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.39

114.06

-106.67

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLT5.L and ERNS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GLT5.LERNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

5.39

-4.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

4.19

-3.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

2.33

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

2.19

-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between GLT5.L and ERNS.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Dividend Comparison

GLT5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than ERNS.L's 5.69% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist		4.15%4.12%4.43%3.76%1.01%0.19%0.33%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)		5.69%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%

Drawdowns

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLT5.L drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, which is greater than ERNS.L's maximum drawdown of -1.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLT5.L and ERNS.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GLT5.LERNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-1.51%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-0.19%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.32%

-0.36%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-1.51%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

0.00%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-0.05%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.04%

+0.43%

Volatility

GLT5.L vs. ERNS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) at 0.30%. This indicates that GLT5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GLT5.LERNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.30%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

0.61%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

0.84%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.12%

0.83%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.84%

0.91%

+1.93%