GLDY vs. COSW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW).

GLDY and COSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDY is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Apr 1, 2025. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025.

Performance

GLDY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	1.71%	4.02%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	17.20%	-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDY achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 17.20% return.

GLDY

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -7.41%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: 17.20%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLDY and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

GLDY

Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF

COSW

Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF

Return for Risk

GLDY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDY	COSW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.44	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between GLDY and COSW is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLDY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.03%, more than COSW's 12.26% yield.

	TTM	2025
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	48.03%	37.38%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	12.26%	4.96%

Drawdowns

GLDY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDY drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDY and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDY	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	-12.17%	-1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.56%	-3.28%	-6.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-4.05%	+1.23%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDY	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	25.36%	-5.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.99%	25.36%	-5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	25.36%	-5.37%