GIMFX vs. RALIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX).

GIMFX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012. RALIX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 29, 2016.

Performance

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	4.96%	25.37%	2.67%	14.75%	-1.24%	4.05%	-7.25%	13.24%	-5.58%	13.55%
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	7.89%	15.60%	5.91%	4.43%	-8.99%	22.32%	0.61%	16.07%	-7.59%	8.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMFX achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than RALIX's 7.89% return.

GIMFX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -5.36%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 6M: 11.65%
• 1Y: 25.30%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 6.46%

RALIX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 18.18%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMFX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RALIX's 0.80% expense ratio.

RALIX

Lazard Real Assets Portfolio

GIMFX

GMO Implementation Fund

Return for Risk

GIMFX vs. RALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIMFX

GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

RALIX

RALIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
RALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
RALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIMFX	RALIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.69	+1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	2.18	+1.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.35	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	2.01	+1.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	10.58	+3.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the RALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMFX and RALIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIMFX	RALIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.69	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	0.70	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.59	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between GIMFX and RALIX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Dividend Comparison

GIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than RALIX's 8.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	4.07%	4.28%	3.39%	5.93%	3.59%	3.28%	2.25%	3.99%	4.59%	2.95%	1.98%
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	8.17%	7.04%	3.07%	2.93%	7.65%	11.84%	3.93%	2.24%	5.27%	1.69%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMFX drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, which is greater than RALIX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMFX and RALIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIMFX	RALIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-24.00%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.79%	-9.39%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.02%	-22.03%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.36%	-4.28%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-5.85%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.78%	-0.03%

Volatility

GIMFX vs. RALIX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) at 2.88%. This indicates that GIMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIMFX	RALIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	2.88%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.81%	6.40%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.81%	11.13%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.46%	11.76%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.93%	11.20%	-2.27%