GGSOX vs. GAOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX).
GGSOX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2015. GAOAX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 2011.
Performance
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSOX Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund | -1.05% | 2.60% | -4.60% | 16.89% | -39.55% | 20.91% | 40.70% | 32.07% | -15.13% | 31.39% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | -3.89% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 15.95% | -6.07% | 16.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGSOX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than GAOAX's -3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GGSOX has outperformed GAOAX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while GAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.74% annualized return.
GGSOX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
GAOAX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -3.89%
- 6M
- -2.79%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGSOX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGSOX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
GGSOX
GAOAX
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGSOX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.24 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.10 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 4.47 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGSOX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.17 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGSOX and GAOAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
GGSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSOX Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 10.61% | 3.19% | 1.62% | 3.30% | 1.63% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 10.04% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGSOX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGSOX and GAOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGSOX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -29.02% | -19.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -8.95% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.71% | -29.02% | -19.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.71% | -29.02% | -19.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.56% | -7.61% | -27.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -6.01% | -11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.20% | +1.78% |
Volatility
GGSOX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund (GGSOX) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 4.98%. This indicates that GGSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGSOX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 4.98% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 7.55% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 11.53% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 11.03% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 10.81% | +8.80% |