GFR vs. POU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO).

Performance

GFR vs. POU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GFR vs. POU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GFR Greenfire Resources Ltd	32.77%	-32.58%	45.27%	-29.36%
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd.	21.95%	55.97%	19.89%	-15.98%

Different Trading Currencies

GFR is traded in USD, while POU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the POU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFR : $500.85M POU.TO : CA$4.28B
EPS GFR : $0.64 POU.TO : CA$8.93
PE Ratio GFR : 9.94 POU.TO : 3.33
PS Ratio GFR : 0.79 POU.TO : 4.30
PB Ratio GFR : 0.43 POU.TO : 1.58
Total Revenue (TTM) GFR : $594.80M POU.TO : CA$998.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) GFR : $183.74M POU.TO : CA$291.70M
EBITDA (TTM) GFR : $176.88M POU.TO : CA$1.92B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFR achieves a 32.77% return, which is significantly higher than POU.TO's 21.95% return.

GFR

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: 6.40%
• YTD: 32.77%
• 6M: 36.80%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POU.TO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: 34.00%
• 1Y: 69.40%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 42.45%
• 10Y*: 26.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GFR vs. POU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFR

GFR Risk / Return Rank: 46
GFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GFR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GFR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

POU.TO

POU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
POU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
POU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
POU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
POU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
POU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFR vs. POU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFR	POU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	2.08	-1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	2.61	-2.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.37	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	3.58	-3.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	9.31	-8.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFR vs. POU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the POU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFR and POU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFR	POU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	2.08	-1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.26	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GFR and POU.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GFR vs. POU.TO - Dividend Comparison

GFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFR Greenfire Resources Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd.	2.02%	64.90%	5.34%	9.64%	3.95%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%

Drawdowns

GFR vs. POU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFR drawdown since its inception was -50.75%, smaller than the maximum POU.TO drawdown of -98.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFR and POU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFR	POU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.75%	-98.41%	+47.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.33%	-19.99%	-14.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.00%	-1.49%	-19.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.21%	-43.70%	+16.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.00%	8.02%	+11.98%

Volatility

GFR vs. POU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) at 8.29%. This indicates that GFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFR	POU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.89%	8.29%	+7.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.59%	20.81%	+14.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.09%	33.62%	+18.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.52%	43.89%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.52%	59.10%	-8.58%

Financials

GFR vs. POU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Greenfire Resources Ltd and Paramount Resources Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.75M and revenue of 138.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

POU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.20M and revenue of 259.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

GFR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported an operating income of 17.82M and revenue of 138.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

POU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of -10.10M and revenue of 259.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.9%.

GFR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported a net income of -8.86M and revenue of 138.33M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.

POU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of -1.90M and revenue of 259.90M, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.