PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. SGDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than SGDM's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 13.98%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.63% annualized return.


GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%

SGDM

1D
-2.86%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.41%
6M
8.11%
1Y
56.96%
3Y*
38.97%
5Y*
18.63%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.41%153.46%12.14%2.34%-8.23%-9.15%21.85%44.27%-15.14%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and SGDM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2014

0.97

The correlation between GDX and SGDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

GDX vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDX
SGDM

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDX
100.0%
SGDM
100.0%

Communication Services

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Consumer Defensive

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Energy

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Financial Services

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Healthcare

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Industrials

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Real Estate

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Technology

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Utilities

GDX

-

SGDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDM
SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXSGDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.91

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

4.83

+0.30

GDX vs. SGDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SGDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and SGDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXSGDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.34

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.26

-0.14

Drawdowns

GDX vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and SGDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXSGDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-54.95%

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.84%

-30.04%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-30.04%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-45.06%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-49.69%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.62%

-25.93%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.43%

-25.46%

-14.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.99%

11.83%

+0.16%

Volatility

GDX vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) at 14.45%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXSGDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

14.45%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.50%

36.91%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.49%

44.84%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.39%

35.78%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

36.81%

+0.37%

GDX vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SGDM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.03%1.04%1.04%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.58%0.02%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GDX and SGDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to SGDM (14.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs SGDM's -54.95%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 12.63% for SGDM. On fees, SGDM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDM has been the lower-risk option at 14.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

SGDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while SGDM is Materials. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.50% for SGDM.

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and SGDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer