GDX vs. SGDM
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while SGDM is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.98%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for SGDM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
GDX vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than SGDM's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 13.98%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.63% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
SGDM
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 56.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
GDX vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.41% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and SGDM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2014 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GDX and SGDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDX vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
SGDM
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
SGDM
Communication Services
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Energy
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Industrials
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Real Estate
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Technology
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Utilities
GDX
-
SGDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
SGDM
GDX vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.91 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 4.83 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.52 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.26 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -54.95% | -25.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.84% | -30.04% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -30.04% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -45.06% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -49.69% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.62% | -25.93% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -25.46% | -14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.99% | 11.83% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GDX vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 15.40% compared to Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) at 14.45%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.40% | 14.45% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.50% | 36.91% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.49% | 44.84% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 35.78% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 36.81% | +0.37% |
GDX vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SGDM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.03% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GDX and SGDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to SGDM (14.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 12.63% for SGDM. On fees, SGDM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDM has been the lower-risk option at 14.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
SGDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while SGDM is Materials. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.50% for SGDM.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer