GDX vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
GDX and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both GDX and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDX or HACK.
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and HACK is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GDX vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GDX:
0.28
HACK:
1.15
GDX:
0.60
HACK:
1.59
GDX:
1.07
HACK:
1.21
GDX:
0.16
HACK:
1.70
GDX:
0.99
HACK:
4.64
GDX:
9.09%
HACK:
4.90%
GDX:
31.89%
HACK:
19.73%
GDX:
-80.57%
HACK:
-42.68%
GDX:
-42.01%
HACK:
-6.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 22.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 7.97%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.
GDX
10.90%
-9.21%
-0.46%
11.73%
6.19%
7.97%
HACK
22.87%
4.30%
18.23%
24.31%
12.91%
11.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDX vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDX vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDX vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
GDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% | 0.90% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and HACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDX vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) at 7.70%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.