GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L).
GCLE.L and PMLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCLE.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2021. PMLP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Jul 27, 2020. Both GCLE.L and PMLP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCLE.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 9.02% | 41.98% | -26.51% | -10.51% | -30.63% | -22.82% |
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 25.45% | 6.05% | 33.55% | 13.28% | 20.86% | 13.92% |
Different Trading Currencies
GCLE.L is traded in USD, while PMLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PMLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCLE.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than PMLP.L's 25.45% return.
GCLE.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 71.92%
- 3Y*
- -1.88%
- 5Y*
- -10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
PMLP.L
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 25.45%
- 6M
- 23.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.24%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCLE.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PMLP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCLE.L
PMLP.L
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCLE.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.06 | 1.18 | +1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | 1.61 | +2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.23 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 1.48 | +3.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.65 | 4.49 | +15.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCLE.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 1.18 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 1.08 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 1.29 | -1.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCLE.L and PMLP.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Dividend Comparison
GCLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCLE.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.72% | 3.31% | 3.37% | 6.48% | 6.12% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
Drawdowns
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCLE.L drawdown since its inception was -72.13%, which is greater than PMLP.L's maximum drawdown of -19.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCLE.L and PMLP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCLE.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.13% | -20.50% | -51.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -14.95% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.94% | -20.50% | -49.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.50% | -1.36% | -44.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.15% | -5.91% | -39.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 7.56% | -4.00% |
Volatility
GCLE.L vs. PMLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) at 5.71%. This indicates that GCLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCLE.L | PMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 5.71% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 11.65% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.61% | 20.72% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 20.58% | +7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.03% | 22.20% | +6.83% |