PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GCLE.L
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc
9.02%41.98%-26.51%-10.51%-9.75%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
-5.89%18.74%17.94%29.72%-14.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCLE.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than IGDA.L's -5.89% return.


GCLE.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
9.02%
6M
18.30%
1Y
71.92%
3Y*
-1.88%
5Y*
-10.08%
10Y*

IGDA.L

1D
0.81%
1M
-8.14%
YTD
-5.89%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCLE.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCLE.L
GCLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GCLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GCLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCLE.LIGDA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.06

1.23

+1.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

1.75

+1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.24

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

1.62

+3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.65

7.29

+12.37

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCLE.L and IGDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCLE.LIGDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

1.23

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.57

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between GCLE.L and IGDA.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GCLE.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCLE.L drawdown since its inception was -72.13%, which is greater than IGDA.L's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCLE.L and IGDA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GCLE.LIGDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.13%

-24.18%

-47.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-11.73%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.50%

-8.98%

-36.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.15%

-5.37%

-39.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.61%

+0.95%

Volatility

GCLE.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that GCLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GCLE.LIGDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

5.17%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

9.69%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.61%

17.00%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

18.64%

+9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.03%

18.64%

+10.39%