GCIIX vs. GOIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX).
GCIIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 15, 1997. GOIIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | -0.88% | 40.72% | 9.65% | 20.80% | -14.91% | 11.71% | 7.83% | 18.52% | -15.82% | 29.65% |
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio | -3.39% | 15.03% | 14.81% | 15.16% | -15.86% | 12.65% | 12.73% | 19.16% | -8.63% | 16.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly higher than GOIIX's -3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GCIIX has outperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
GCIIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
GOIIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 12.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCIIX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank
GCIIX
GOIIX
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCIIX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.21 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.61 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.98 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 4.37 | +3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCIIX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.21 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.60 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.52 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCIIX and GOIIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison
GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than GOIIX's 8.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | 7.85% | 7.78% | 9.24% | 2.81% | 3.94% | 6.33% | 1.86% | 2.46% | 1.94% | 1.62% | 2.51% | 1.45% |
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio | 8.88% | 7.98% | 9.79% | 1.97% | 5.09% | 6.80% | 3.47% | 2.29% | 3.04% | 2.73% | 1.37% | 3.99% |
Drawdowns
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than GOIIX's maximum drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GOIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCIIX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -43.63% | -17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -8.55% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -23.78% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | -25.07% | -14.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -7.10% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.11% | -6.44% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.14% | +1.00% |
Volatility
GCIIX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) at 3.77%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCIIX | GOIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 3.77% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 6.48% | +4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 10.40% | +6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 10.58% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 11.22% | +5.45% |