GCED.L vs. NRJL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L).
GCED.L and NRJL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCED.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2021. NRJL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. Both GCED.L and NRJL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 12.37% | 41.92% | -26.55% | -10.54% | -30.72% | -22.60% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 17.19% | 148.33% | -13.04% | -18.82% | 7.87% | 40.42% |
Different Trading Currencies
GCED.L is traded in USD, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCED.L achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 17.19% return.
GCED.L
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- 75.00%
- 3Y*
- -0.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.58%
- 10Y*
- —
NRJL.L
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 117.09%
- 1Y
- 200.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.01%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GCED.L and NRJL.L have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCED.L
NRJL.L
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCED.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 2.77 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 8.96 | -5.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 2.32 | -0.82 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.51 | 20.48 | -13.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.61 | 67.88 | -46.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCED.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.77 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.54 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.61 | -0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCED.L and NRJL.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison
GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than NRJL.L's 35.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.85% | 2.09% | 1.43% | 0.68% | 0.09% | 0.20% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 35.50% | 42.07% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 23.99% | 31.56% |
Drawdowns
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCED.L drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCED.L and NRJL.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCED.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -51.06% | -21.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -9.66% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.99% | -51.06% | -18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.81% | -3.97% | -39.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -22.78% | -22.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.45% | +0.99% |
Volatility
GCED.L vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) is 6.08%, while Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that GCED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCED.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 7.92% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 54.78% | -38.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.48% | 71.94% | -48.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.38% | 46.55% | -18.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 45.34% | -16.46% |