GB vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Global Blue Group Holding AG (GB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GB or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between GB and XLF is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GB vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GB:
1.07
XLF:
2.19
GB:
1.68
XLF:
3.13
GB:
1.22
XLF:
1.40
GB:
0.81
XLF:
4.26
GB:
6.57
XLF:
12.61
GB:
8.46%
XLF:
2.51%
GB:
51.86%
XLF:
14.53%
GB:
-74.40%
XLF:
-82.43%
GB:
-46.84%
XLF:
-1.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GB achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 6.33% return.
GB
5.48%
0.14%
57.54%
55.20%
N/A
N/A
XLF
6.33%
1.46%
17.59%
31.68%
13.04%
14.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GB vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GB
XLF
GB vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Blue Group Holding AG (GB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GB vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
GB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GB Global Blue Group Holding AG | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
GB vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GB drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GB and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GB vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Global Blue Group Holding AG (GB) has a higher volatility of 19.78% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 3.16%. This indicates that GB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.