GAOAX vs. MSFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX).
GAOAX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 2011. MSFAX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2001.
Performance
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | -5.28% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 15.95% | -6.07% | 16.82% |
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | -13.49% | -11.65% | 8.94% | 16.41% | -17.26% | 21.89% | 13.24% | 34.63% | -1.66% | 24.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAOAX achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly higher than MSFAX's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GAOAX has underperformed MSFAX with an annualized return of 5.59%, while MSFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.27% annualized return.
GAOAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
MSFAX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -26.38%
- 1Y
- -25.95%
- 3Y*
- -3.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAOAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFAX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAOAX vs. MSFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GAOAX
MSFAX
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAOAX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -1.33 | +2.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | -1.68 | +2.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.72 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.86 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | -2.10 | +5.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAOAX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -1.33 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.04 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAOAX and MSFAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Dividend Comparison
GAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, while MSFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 10.19% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.85% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 8.23% | 5.76% | 3.72% | 3.11% | 4.75% |
Drawdowns
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAOAX drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, smaller than the maximum MSFAX drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAOAX and MSFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAOAX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.02% | -43.81% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -30.00% | +21.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -33.89% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.02% | -33.89% | +4.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -33.13% | +24.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -5.69% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 12.30% | -10.15% |
Volatility
GAOAX vs. MSFAX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) at 4.10%. This indicates that GAOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAOAX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 4.10% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 15.72% | -8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 19.24% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.02% | 16.91% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.80% | 16.90% | -6.10% |