GACB.DE vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD).
GACB.DE and GLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GACB.DE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity. It was launched on Nov 4, 2019. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. Both GACB.DE and GLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GACB.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 4.68% | 17.61% | 13.29% | 6.42% | -14.91% | 7.63% | 1.70% | 2.23% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 10.31% | 44.25% | 35.02% | 9.31% | 5.38% | 3.02% | 14.53% | 1.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
GACB.DE is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GACB.DE achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 12.17% return.
GACB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 6M
- 25.02%
- 1Y
- 42.23%
- 3Y*
- 30.76%
- 5Y*
- 22.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GACB.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GACB.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GACB.DE
GLD
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GACB.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.09 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 2.45 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | 8.43 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GACB.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.37 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between GACB.DE and GLD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GACB.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GACB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACB.DE and GLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GACB.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -45.56% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -19.21% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.46% | -21.03% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -13.41% | +4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.69% | -16.17% | +7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 5.32% | -1.95% |
Volatility
GACB.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE) is 7.14%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that GACB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GACB.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 10.54% | -3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 23.32% | -11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 25.76% | -7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 16.49% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 14.82% | +2.77% |