FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO).

FXM.TO and XEG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXM.TO is a passively managed fund by CI Investments that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2012. XEG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2001. Both FXM.TO and XEG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	8.97%	38.54%	30.05%	5.79%	-1.19%	31.47%	6.15%	24.14%	-16.22%	11.51%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	41.93%	16.72%	14.08%	3.52%	53.25%	83.71%	-34.41%	8.98%	-27.05%	-11.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 41.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FXM.TO has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 14.20%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.00% annualized return.

FXM.TO

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -3.54%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 20.63%
• 1Y: 50.77%
• 3Y*: 26.11%
• 5Y*: 18.45%
• 10Y*: 14.20%

XEG.TO

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 15.54%
• YTD: 41.93%
• 6M: 49.98%
• 1Y: 59.58%
• 3Y*: 26.94%
• 5Y*: 32.83%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

FXM.TO

CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF

XEG.TO

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Return for Risk

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXM.TO

FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

XEG.TO

XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXM.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.42	2.31	+1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	2.76	+1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.42	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	2.98	+1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.67	10.68	+9.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXM.TO and XEG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXM.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42	2.31	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.30	1.16	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.39	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.28	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between FXM.TO and XEG.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than XEG.TO's 2.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	1.93%	1.91%	2.17%	2.96%	2.18%	2.19%	2.40%	2.03%	2.52%	1.70%	1.83%	2.24%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	2.70%	3.63%	3.46%	4.26%	3.31%	1.64%	2.96%	2.70%	2.25%	1.41%	1.40%	3.58%

Drawdowns

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and XEG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXM.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.41%	-87.74%	+41.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-20.69%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	-28.42%	+12.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.41%	-79.66%	+33.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-1.13%	-3.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-29.36%	+24.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	5.78%	-3.27%

Volatility

FXM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) is 4.37%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that FXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXM.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	5.36%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	14.71%	-4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	25.99%	-11.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	28.48%	-14.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	33.30%	-16.25%