FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO).
FXM.TO and HVOI.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXM.TO is a passively managed fund by CI Investments that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2012. HVOI.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 11, 2025.
Performance
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 8.97% | 46.40% |
HVOI.TO Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A | 1.09% | 15.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than HVOI.TO's 1.09% return.
FXM.TO
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- 1Y
- 50.77%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 18.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
HVOI.TO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FXM.TO
HVOI.TO
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXM.TO | HVOI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.42 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.07 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXM.TO | HVOI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.08 | -1.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXM.TO and HVOI.TO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Dividend Comparison
FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than HVOI.TO's 5.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 1.93% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.18% | 2.19% | 2.40% | 2.03% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 2.24% |
HVOI.TO Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A | 5.95% | 4.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than HVOI.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and HVOI.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXM.TO | HVOI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -6.72% | -39.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -4.88% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -0.79% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
FXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXM.TO | HVOI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.95% | 8.37% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 8.37% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 8.37% | +8.68% |