PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-1.52%22.37%18.07%9.23%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
-3.18%18.74%17.94%8.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly higher than IGDA.L's -3.18% return.


FWRA.L

1D
3.00%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-1.52%
6M
2.01%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGDA.L

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
1.04%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWRA.LIGDA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.87

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.29

+1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.79

9.52

+6.26

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and IGDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWRA.LIGDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.61

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and IGDA.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRA.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum IGDA.L drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and IGDA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRA.LIGDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-24.18%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.73%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-6.36%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-5.37%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.33%

-0.35%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FWRA.LIGDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

5.72%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

10.08%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

17.17%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

18.69%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

18.69%

-5.28%