PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. SDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. SDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than SDY's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed SDY with an annualized return of 8.30%, while SDY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%

SDY

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.49%
6M
7.45%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. SDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
7.49%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and SDY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.93

The correlation between FVD and SDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FVD vs. SDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
SDY

Financial Services

19.1%
11.5%

Utilities

18.4%
14.8%

Industrials

14.2%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.6%
17.1%

Real Estate

8.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

7.8%
6.2%

Technology

6.1%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
5.2%

Energy

4.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.4%

Financial Services

FVD
19.1%
SDY
11.5%

Utilities

FVD
18.4%
SDY
14.8%

Industrials

FVD
14.2%
SDY
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVD
11.6%
SDY
17.1%

Real Estate

FVD
8.1%
SDY
4.6%

Healthcare

FVD
7.8%
SDY
6.2%

Technology

FVD
6.1%
SDY
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.6%
SDY
5.2%

Energy

FVD
4.0%
SDY
4.6%

Communication Services

FVD
3.0%
SDY
3.5%

Basic Materials

FVD
2.1%
SDY
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. SDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. SDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVDSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.68

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

4.60

-2.03

FVD vs. SDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the SDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and SDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVDSDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.25

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Drawdowns

FVD vs. SDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum SDY drawdown of -54.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and SDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-54.75%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-7.67%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-14.39%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-15.21%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-36.70%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-4.07%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-6.21%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.79%

-0.13%

Volatility

FVD vs. SDY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) at 2.47%. This indicates that FVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.47%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

7.43%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

10.33%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

14.03%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

17.08%

-1.64%

FVD vs. SDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SDY's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. SDY - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than SDY's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.48%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FVD and SDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVD has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to SDY (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs SDY's -54.75%.

On 10-year performance, SDY leads with 9.29% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDY has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.35% for SDY.

SDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and SDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer