PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXN vs. ION
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTXN vs. ION - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FTXN vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
34.14%-0.17%4.06%4.91%-5.10%
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
10.74%108.37%-20.02%-14.10%-8.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXN achieves a 34.14% return, which is significantly higher than ION's 10.74% return.


FTXN

1D
-3.32%
1M
5.47%
YTD
34.14%
6M
31.92%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*

ION

1D
1.14%
1M
-10.68%
YTD
10.74%
6M
47.40%
1Y
128.27%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTXN vs. ION - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ION's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FTXN vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXN
FTXN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FTXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ION
ION Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXN vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXNIONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

3.30

-2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

3.53

-2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

5.46

-4.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.11

20.91

-17.80

FTXN vs. ION - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the ION Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXN and ION, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXNIONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

3.30

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.38

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FTXN and ION is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FTXN vs. ION - Dividend Comparison

FTXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than ION's 1.44% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
2.02%2.83%2.51%3.41%2.26%1.04%1.76%2.72%2.16%1.78%0.20%
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
1.44%1.63%1.74%2.23%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FTXN vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXN drawdown since its inception was -73.49%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXN and ION.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXNIONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.49%

-52.08%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.61%

-23.30%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

-12.05%

+5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.43%

-24.59%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

6.09%

+2.40%

Volatility

FTXN vs. ION - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN) is 6.67%, while Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that FTXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FTXNIONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

12.68%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

30.43%

-14.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

39.05%

-10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.03%

30.73%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.86%

30.73%

+1.13%