PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
-0.38%8.00%
QQQQ.TO
Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
-7.35%8.46%
Different Trading Currencies

FTQI is traded in USD, while QQQQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQQQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than QQQQ.TO's -7.35% return.


FTQI

1D
1.00%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
3.73%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
6.96%

QQQQ.TO

1D
2.13%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQQ.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTQIQQQQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.01

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTQIQQQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.06

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and QQQQ.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than QQQQ.TO's 0.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.85%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
QQQQ.TO
Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, which is greater than QQQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and QQQQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIQQQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-11.95%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-10.17%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.94%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

FTQI vs. QQQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FTQIQQQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.07%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

17.07%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

17.07%

-3.66%