FSNLX vs. PDDDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX).

FSNLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 20, 2017. PDDDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 12, 2016.

Performance

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K	-0.99%	13.23%	6.29%	11.43%	-14.53%	7.36%	12.32%	16.37%	-4.36%	3.37%
PDDDX Prudential Day One 2020 Fund	-0.38%	10.40%	15.97%	9.52%	-12.63%	36.80%	8.13%	14.99%	-4.65%	4.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNLX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PDDDX's -0.38% return.

FSNLX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: -0.99%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 9.98%
• 3Y*: 8.22%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: —

PDDDX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 8.21%
• 3Y*: 10.50%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNLX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PDDDX's 0.76% expense ratio.

PDDDX

Prudential Day One 2020 Fund

FSNLX

Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K

Return for Risk

FSNLX vs. PDDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNLX

FSNLX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FSNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FSNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FSNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FSNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PDDDX

PDDDX Risk / Return Rank: 73
PDDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PDDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PDDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
PDDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PDDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSNLX	PDDDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.29	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.82	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.55	+0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	7.61	+0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the PDDDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNLX and PDDDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSNLX	PDDDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	1.29	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.76	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.77	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FSNLX and PDDDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Dividend Comparison

FSNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than PDDDX's 4.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K	6.57%	6.50%	4.02%	2.74%	8.44%	10.79%	6.72%	6.77%	8.21%	2.16%
PDDDX Prudential Day One 2020 Fund	4.07%	4.05%	19.73%	3.22%	8.41%	28.05%	1.91%	3.76%	3.05%	0.86%

Drawdowns

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNLX drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, which is greater than PDDDX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNLX and PDDDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSNLX	PDDDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-18.88%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.05%	-5.29%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.41%	-16.64%	-3.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-3.71%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-3.06%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.08%	+0.12%

Volatility

FSNLX vs. PDDDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) at 2.04%. This indicates that FSNLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSNLX	PDDDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	2.04%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	3.54%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.86%	6.57%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.54%	13.74%	-6.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.88%	11.45%	-3.57%