PortfoliosLab logo
FSM vs. GDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSM and GDX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

FSM vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
239.61%
55.62%
FSM
GDX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSM:

0.66

GDX:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

FSM:

1.24

GDX:

2.17

Omega Ratio

FSM:

1.16

GDX:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

FSM:

0.65

GDX:

1.24

Martin Ratio

FSM:

1.70

GDX:

5.92

Ulcer Index

FSM:

21.50%

GDX:

9.24%

Daily Std Dev

FSM:

55.42%

GDX:

33.39%

Max Drawdown

FSM:

-92.25%

GDX:

-80.57%

Current Drawdown

FSM:

-35.74%

GDX:

-15.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 46.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 5.28%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


FSM

YTD

42.89%

1M

0.33%

6M

17.88%

1Y

32.11%

5Y*

17.79%

10Y*

5.28%

GDX

YTD

46.74%

1M

10.53%

6M

19.50%

1Y

52.01%

5Y*

9.45%

10Y*

10.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSM vs. GDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSM is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSM is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSM is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSM is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GDX is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GDX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GDX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GDX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GDX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GDX is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSM vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
FSM: 0.66
GDX: 1.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
FSM: 1.24
GDX: 2.17
The chart of Omega ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FSM: 1.16
GDX: 1.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
FSM: 0.65
GDX: 1.24
The chart of Martin ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
FSM: 1.70
GDX: 5.92

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.66
1.64
FSM
GDX

Dividends

FSM vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF
0.81%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.65%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%0.66%

Drawdowns

FSM vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-35.74%
-15.11%
FSM
GDX

Volatility

FSM vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 20.23% compared to VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 15.86%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.23%
15.86%
FSM
GDX