FRDM vs. VTI
FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRDM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRDM returned 17.22%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for VTI. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FRDM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
FRDM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.49% return.
FRDM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.15%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.90%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.77M | $21.45M | $25.02M | |
| $1.06B | $1.16B | $1.24B |
FRDM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 28.12% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 22.77% | -14.45% | 6.13% | 16.90% | 12.23% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.49% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 13.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDM and VTI is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FRDM and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FRDM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRDM
VTI
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
FRDM
VTI
Technology
FRDM
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
FRDM
VTI
Basic Materials
FRDM
VTI
Real Estate
FRDM
VTI
Energy
FRDM
VTI
Utilities
FRDM
VTI
Consumer Defensive
FRDM
VTI
Industrials
FRDM
VTI
Communication Services
FRDM
VTI
Healthcare
FRDM
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRDM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FRDM
VTI
FRDM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRDM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.23 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 9.62 | +1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRDM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -55.45% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.24% | -8.92% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.24% | -19.30% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | -25.36% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.15% | -1.36% | -12.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -7.99% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 2.07% | +3.70% |
Volatility
FRDM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that FRDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRDM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.28% | 3.46% | +8.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.47% | 10.24% | +18.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.66% | 13.10% | +17.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 17.51% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 18.30% | +5.32% |
FRDM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRDM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than VTI's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRDM and VTI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRDM has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDM dropped -40.49% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 17.22% vs 11.74% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.
FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.06% for VTI.
FRDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.03% for VTI.
FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRDM and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer