FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FRCH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L).
FRCH.L and XCNA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRCH.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. XCNA.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. Both FRCH.L and XCNA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRCH.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -4.52% | 23.22% | 21.12% | -17.46% | -7.26% |
XCNA.L Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 2.26% | 23.10% | 16.47% | -16.84% | 13.29% |
Different Trading Currencies
FRCH.L is traded in GBP, while XCNA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XCNA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRCH.L achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than XCNA.L's 2.26% return.
FRCH.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- -4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XCNA.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRCH.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XCNA.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRCH.L
XCNA.L
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FRCH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRCH.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 1.67 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 2.18 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 4.12 | -3.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 11.71 | -10.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRCH.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.67 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.37 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRCH.L and XCNA.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FRCH.L nor XCNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRCH.L drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, which is greater than XCNA.L's maximum drawdown of -35.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCH.L and XCNA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRCH.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.27% | -32.05% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -11.13% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.18% | -3.79% | -26.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -14.83% | -14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 2.22% | +3.70% |
Volatility
FRCH.L vs. XCNA.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FRCH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L) have volatilities of 5.81% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRCH.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 5.54% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 11.73% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 17.09% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.61% | 23.77% | +8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 23.77% | +7.62% |