PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQTIX vs. DLHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and MassMutual High Yield Fund (DLHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
1.02%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%
DLHYX
MassMutual High Yield Fund
-0.64%8.61%6.37%11.16%-12.43%7.29%4.66%5.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than DLHYX's -0.64% return.


FQTIX

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
1.02%
6M
3.05%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

DLHYX

1D
0.62%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
0.66%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DLHYX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. DLHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DLHYX
DLHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DLHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DLHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and MassMutual High Yield Fund (DLHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQTIXDLHYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

1.82

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

2.56

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.42

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

2.26

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.41

10.20

+8.21

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the DLHYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and DLHYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQTIXDLHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.82

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.67

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.28

-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and DLHYX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than DLHYX's 6.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
7.00%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DLHYX
MassMutual High Yield Fund
6.14%6.72%4.14%4.59%4.64%5.80%5.20%6.14%6.02%6.40%6.14%6.89%

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum DLHYX drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and DLHYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FQTIXDLHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-27.28%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-3.35%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-16.45%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.58%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-3.45%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.74%

-0.19%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. DLHYX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to MassMutual High Yield Fund (DLHYX) at 1.53%. This indicates that FQTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FQTIXDLHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.53%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

2.37%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.92%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

4.93%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.80%

5.48%

+2.32%