FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Salesforce, Inc. CDR (FOO0.F) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L).
XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009.
Performance
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOO0.F Salesforce, Inc. CDR | -29.10% | -29.47% | 21.41% | 95.84% | -37.88% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | -7.30% | 9.72% | 50.98% | 55.05% | -15.54% |
Different Trading Currencies
FOO0.F is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOO0.F achieves a -29.10% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's -10.42% return.
FOO0.F
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -29.10%
- 6M
- -20.53%
- 1Y
- -33.58%
- 3Y*
- -6.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -10.42%
- 6M
- -8.65%
- 1Y
- 18.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 21.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
FOO0.F
XLKQ.L
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salesforce, Inc. CDR (FOO0.F) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOO0.F | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | 0.75 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | 1.16 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.10 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 3.01 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOO0.F | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | 0.75 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 1.08 | -1.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOO0.F and XLKQ.L is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
FOO0.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOO0.F Salesforce, Inc. CDR | 0.81% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOO0.F drawdown since its inception was -61.27%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOO0.F and XLKQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOO0.F | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.27% | -28.74% | -32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.20% | -16.76% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.12% | -13.73% | -44.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -5.08% | -17.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.54% | 6.21% | +17.33% |
Volatility
FOO0.F vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Salesforce, Inc. CDR (FOO0.F) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 4.38%. This indicates that FOO0.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOO0.F | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 4.38% | +8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.47% | 14.50% | +23.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.16% | 24.23% | +31.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.33% | 22.55% | +23.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.33% | 21.98% | +24.35% |