PortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and XLF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FNV vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,287.31%
239.58%
FNV
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNV:

1.54

XLF:

0.92

Sortino Ratio

FNV:

2.01

XLF:

1.37

Omega Ratio

FNV:

1.28

XLF:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

FNV:

1.44

XLF:

1.20

Martin Ratio

FNV:

6.55

XLF:

4.72

Ulcer Index

FNV:

6.75%

XLF:

3.94%

Daily Std Dev

FNV:

28.72%

XLF:

20.15%

Max Drawdown

FNV:

-58.76%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

FNV:

-1.78%

XLF:

-7.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 45.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -0.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNV having a 14.13% annualized return and XLF not far behind at 13.86%.


FNV

YTD

45.02%

1M

10.97%

6M

26.11%

1Y

41.54%

5Y*

5.58%

10Y*

14.13%

XLF

YTD

-0.28%

1M

-4.49%

6M

3.80%

1Y

19.30%

5Y*

19.43%

10Y*

13.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNV vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNV is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNV is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNV is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNV is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNV is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNV is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNV vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
FNV: 1.54
XLF: 0.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNV, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
FNV: 2.01
XLF: 1.37
The chart of Omega ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FNV: 1.28
XLF: 1.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
FNV: 1.44
XLF: 1.20
The chart of Martin ratio for FNV, currently valued at 6.55, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
FNV: 6.55
XLF: 4.72

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.54
0.92
FNV
XLF

Dividends

FNV vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XLF's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.86%1.22%1.23%0.94%0.84%0.82%0.72%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%1.59%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.48%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

FNV vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.78%
-7.66%
FNV
XLF

Volatility

FNV vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have volatilities of 13.67% and 13.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.67%
13.51%
FNV
XLF