FNDC vs. VEA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA).
FNDC and VEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. VEA is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2007. Both FNDC and VEA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDC or VEA.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and VEA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDC vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNDC:
0.29
VEA:
0.44
FNDC:
0.49
VEA:
0.68
FNDC:
1.06
VEA:
1.08
FNDC:
0.32
VEA:
0.62
FNDC:
1.13
VEA:
1.77
FNDC:
3.52%
VEA:
3.20%
FNDC:
13.53%
VEA:
12.96%
FNDC:
-43.22%
VEA:
-60.70%
FNDC:
-9.36%
VEA:
-9.17%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 2.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDC having a 5.21% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 5.33%.
FNDC
0.84%
-1.28%
-0.41%
2.94%
3.20%
5.21%
VEA
2.90%
-1.90%
-1.75%
4.65%
4.85%
5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDC vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDC vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDC vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than VEA's 1.84% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.61% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.96% | 1.30% | 1.61% | 0.64% |
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 1.84% | 3.16% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% | 3.68% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and VEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDC vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 3.19%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.