PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNDC vs. VEA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and VEA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

FNDC vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.44%
-3.15%
FNDC
VEA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNDC:

0.15

VEA:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

FNDC:

0.29

VEA:

0.58

Omega Ratio

FNDC:

1.04

VEA:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

FNDC:

0.16

VEA:

0.47

Martin Ratio

FNDC:

0.47

VEA:

1.19

Ulcer Index

FNDC:

4.16%

VEA:

3.89%

Daily Std Dev

FNDC:

13.41%

VEA:

12.84%

Max Drawdown

FNDC:

-43.22%

VEA:

-60.69%

Current Drawdown

FNDC:

-9.65%

VEA:

-8.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 5.31%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.58% annualized return.


FNDC

YTD

-0.85%

1M

-2.81%

6M

-4.13%

1Y

4.19%

5Y*

3.09%

10Y*

5.31%

VEA

YTD

0.73%

1M

-1.76%

6M

-4.10%

1Y

6.53%

5Y*

4.65%

10Y*

5.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNDC vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.05% expense ratio.


FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for FNDC: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for VEA: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNDC vs. VEA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNDC is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNDC is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNDC is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNDC is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNDC is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNDC is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VEA is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VEA is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VEA is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VEA is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VEA is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VEA is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNDC vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNDC, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.150.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNDC, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.290.58
The chart of Omega ratio for FNDC, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.041.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNDC, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.160.47
The chart of Martin ratio for FNDC, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.471.19
FNDC
VEA

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and VEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.15
0.36
FNDC
VEA

Dividends

FNDC vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than VEA's 3.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
3.62%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.96%1.30%1.61%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
3.33%3.36%3.16%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%3.68%

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and VEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.65%
-8.29%
FNDC
VEA

Volatility

FNDC vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 3.23%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.23%
3.69%
FNDC
VEA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab