FND vs. ADP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP).

Performance

FND vs. ADP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FND vs. ADP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FND Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.	-16.57%	-38.93%	-10.63%	60.22%	-46.44%	40.02%	82.74%	96.18%	-46.80%	51.89%
ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc.	-20.36%	-10.18%	28.41%	-0.25%	-1.29%	42.60%	5.86%	32.71%	14.25%	13.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FND : $5.51B ADP : $82.23B
EPS FND : $1.92 ADP : $10.42
PE Ratio FND : 26.39 ADP : 19.50
PS Ratio FND : 1.18 ADP : 3.89
PB Ratio FND : 2.29 ADP : 12.86
Total Revenue (TTM) FND : $4.68B ADP : $21.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) FND : $2.04B ADP : $10.26B
EBITDA (TTM) FND : $451.90M ADP : $6.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FND achieves a -16.57% return, which is significantly higher than ADP's -20.36% return.

FND

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -26.47%
• YTD: -16.57%
• 6M: -31.07%
• 1Y: -36.87%
• 3Y*: -19.73%
• 5Y*: -12.47%
• 10Y*: —

ADP

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -4.43%
• YTD: -20.36%
• 6M: -29.75%
• 1Y: -31.83%
• 3Y*: -0.75%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FND vs. ADP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FND

FND Risk / Return Rank: 10
FND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FND Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FND Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FND Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FND Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ADP

ADP Risk / Return Rank: 4
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FND vs. ADP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FND	ADP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	-1.42	+0.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	-1.98	+0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.75	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.83	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	-1.75	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FND vs. ADP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FND Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is higher than the ADP Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FND and ADP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FND	ADP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76	-1.42	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.17	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.53	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FND and ADP is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FND vs. ADP - Dividend Comparison

FND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ADP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FND Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc.	3.19%	2.46%	1.96%	2.21%	1.83%	1.55%	2.08%	1.92%	2.14%	2.00%	2.10%	2.36%

Drawdowns

FND vs. ADP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FND drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than ADP's maximum drawdown of -59.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FND and ADP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FND	ADP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-59.51%	-6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.42%	-36.87%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.56%	-36.87%	-28.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.55%	-36.27%	-28.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.39%	-12.50%	-13.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.51%	17.59%	+3.92%

Volatility

FND vs. ADP - Volatility Comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) at 7.22%. This indicates that FND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FND	ADP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.76%	7.22%	+5.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.77%	16.74%	+14.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.49%	22.58%	+25.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.29%	21.39%	+23.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.52%	24.11%	+24.41%

Financials

FND vs. ADP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 550.97M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.

ADP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.47B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

FND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.30M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

ADP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

FND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 39.33M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

ADP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.