FNB vs. RF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).

Performance

FNB vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNB vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNB F.N.B. Corporation	-1.53%	19.37%	10.96%	9.76%	11.74%	32.83%	-20.81%	34.49%	-26.16%	-7.76%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	-2.69%	21.99%	27.00%	-5.69%	2.33%	39.39%	-1.61%	33.35%	-20.59%	22.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FNB : $6.05B RF : $22.99B
EPS FNB : $1.56 RF : $2.42
PE Ratio FNB : 10.71 RF : 10.80
PS Ratio FNB : 2.25 RF : 2.42
PB Ratio FNB : 0.90 RF : 1.30
Total Revenue (TTM) FNB : $2.70B RF : $9.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) FNB : $1.68B RF : $7.17B
EBITDA (TTM) FNB : $724.74M RF : $2.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNB achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FNB has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 6.93%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.

FNB

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: -1.53%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 28.13%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: 6.93%

RF

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FNB vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNB

FNB Risk / Return Rank: 71
FNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNB Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FNB Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RF

RF Risk / Return Rank: 69
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNB vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNB	RF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.85	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	1.47	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	3.71	+1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNB vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNB Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNB and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNB	RF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.85	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.29	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.47	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.17	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between FNB and RF is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FNB vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

FNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than RF's 4.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNB F.N.B. Corporation	2.87%	2.81%	3.25%	3.49%	3.68%	3.96%	5.05%	3.78%	4.88%	6.75%	2.99%	3.60%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	4.00%	5.12%	4.17%	4.54%	3.43%	2.98%	3.85%	3.44%	3.44%	1.82%	1.78%	2.40%

Drawdowns

FNB vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNB drawdown since its inception was -69.60%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNB and RF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNB	RF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.60%	-92.65%	+23.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.90%	-18.45%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.59%	-40.99%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.11%	-60.73%	+0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.00%	-14.79%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.40%	-31.19%	+12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	7.31%	-1.38%

Volatility

FNB vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNB	RF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.61%	6.68%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.79%	18.83%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.78%	29.81%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.46%	31.63%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.44%	36.02%	-0.58%

Financials

FNB vs. RF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between F.N.B. Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FNB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, F.N.B. Corporation reported a gross profit of 438.91M and revenue of 679.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

FNB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, F.N.B. Corporation reported an operating income of 165.74M and revenue of 679.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

FNB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, F.N.B. Corporation reported a net income of 168.69M and revenue of 679.83M, resulting in a net margin of 24.8%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.