PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNB vs. FJRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNB vs. FJRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNB achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than FJRLX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FNB has outperformed FJRLX with an annualized return of 8.50%, while FJRLX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.34% annualized return.


FNB

1D
0.71%
1M
5.52%
YTD
8.94%
6M
4.42%
1Y
35.97%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
8.50%

FJRLX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNB vs. FJRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNB
F.N.B. Corporation
8.94%19.37%10.96%9.76%11.74%32.83%-20.81%34.49%-26.16%-7.76%
FJRLX
Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund
0.54%6.70%4.62%6.26%-6.22%-1.46%5.16%6.04%0.71%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FNB and FJRLX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013

-0.16

The correlation between FNB and FJRLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNB vs. FJRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNB
FNB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FJRLX
FJRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FJRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FJRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNB vs. FJRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNBFJRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.62

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

9.75

-3.65

FNB vs. FJRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FJRLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNB and FJRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNB vs. FJRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNB drawdown since its inception was -69.60%, which is greater than FJRLX's maximum drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNB and FJRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNBFJRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.60%

-9.89%

-59.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-1.63%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.59%

-1.63%

-30.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-9.71%

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.11%

-9.89%

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.43%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-1.34%

-16.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

0.44%

+5.48%

Volatility

FNB vs. FJRLX - Volatility Comparison

F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) at 0.81%. This indicates that FNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNBFJRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

0.81%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

1.70%

+16.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

2.17%

+23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.13%

2.77%

+26.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

2.41%

+33.04%

Dividends

FNB vs. FJRLX - Dividend Comparison

FNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FJRLX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJRLX
Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund
4.09%3.93%3.08%2.38%1.26%1.25%2.38%2.44%2.29%1.79%1.88%1.60%
FNB
F.N.B. Corporation
2.67%2.81%3.25%3.49%3.68%3.96%5.05%3.78%4.88%6.75%2.99%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNB and FJRLX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNB has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to FJRLX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNB dropped -69.60% vs FJRLX's -9.89%.

FJRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNB and FJRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer