PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GRT-UN.TOFN.TO
YTD Return0.12%13.06%
1Y Return12.92%14.59%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.57%6.75%
5Y Return (Ann)5.80%7.20%
10Y Return (Ann)10.19%14.36%
Sharpe Ratio0.770.90
Sortino Ratio1.271.20
Omega Ratio1.151.18
Calmar Ratio0.451.01
Martin Ratio2.202.39
Ulcer Index7.39%7.06%
Daily Std Dev20.99%18.65%
Max Drawdown-87.72%-63.24%
Current Drawdown-23.30%-0.48%

Fundamentals


GRT-UN.TOFN.TO
Market CapCA$4.69BCA$2.48B
EPSCA$3.64CA$3.79
PE Ratio20.5310.87
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$409.05MCA$1.21B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$340.70MCA$130.57M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$314.36MCA$156.99M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and FN.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FN.TO's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has underperformed FN.TO with an annualized return of 10.19%, while FN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.36% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.26%
13.84%
GRT-UN.TO
FN.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and First National Financial Corporation (FN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRT-UN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRT-UN.TO, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRT-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GRT-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRT-UN.TO, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GRT-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.72
FN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FN.TO, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FN.TO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FN.TO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FN.TO, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FN.TO, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.94

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the FN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRT-UN.TO and FN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
0.77
GRT-UN.TO
FN.TO

Dividends

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Dividend Comparison

GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FN.TO's 7.65% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
2.65%2.59%3.75%2.28%2.97%3.20%4.14%4.53%4.47%5.20%5.25%5.72%
FN.TO
First National Financial Corporation
7.65%8.21%6.48%8.46%5.97%6.32%9.83%10.14%6.13%6.72%6.31%6.12%

Drawdowns

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.72%, which is greater than FN.TO's maximum drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and FN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-30.22%
-12.51%
GRT-UN.TO
FN.TO

Volatility

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to First National Financial Corporation (FN.TO) at 3.90%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.22%
3.90%
GRT-UN.TO
FN.TO

Financials

GRT-UN.TO vs. FN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and First National Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items