PortfoliosLab logo
FMAO vs. AGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FMAO and AGM is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FMAO vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMAO:

0.34

AGM:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

FMAO:

0.73

AGM:

0.74

Omega Ratio

FMAO:

1.09

AGM:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FMAO:

0.24

AGM:

0.47

Martin Ratio

FMAO:

0.74

AGM:

0.99

Ulcer Index

FMAO:

16.67%

AGM:

10.72%

Daily Std Dev

FMAO:

43.49%

AGM:

29.93%

Max Drawdown

FMAO:

-62.88%

AGM:

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

FMAO:

-39.87%

AGM:

-12.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FMAO:

$328.81M

AGM:

$1.95B

EPS

FMAO:

$2.01

AGM:

$16.18

PE Ratio

FMAO:

11.85

AGM:

11.67

PEG Ratio

FMAO:

0.00

AGM:

1.56

PS Ratio

FMAO:

3.16

AGM:

5.46

PB Ratio

FMAO:

0.96

AGM:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

FMAO:

$139.74M

AGM:

$784.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FMAO:

$123.13M

AGM:

$499.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

FMAO:

$44.20M

AGM:

$845.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAO achieves a -18.34% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's -4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FMAO has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 9.16%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.


FMAO

YTD

-18.34%

1M

-9.02%

6M

-27.71%

1Y

14.57%

3Y*

-13.10%

5Y*

5.20%

10Y*

9.16%

AGM

YTD

-4.60%

1M

6.33%

6M

-11.39%

1Y

9.40%

3Y*

24.92%

5Y*

28.06%

10Y*

23.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMAO vs. AGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMAO is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMAO is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMAO is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMAO is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMAO is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMAO is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGM is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGM is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGM is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMAO vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FMAO Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAO and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FMAO vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

FMAO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than AGM's 3.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FMAO
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
3.71%2.99%3.43%2.99%2.16%2.87%2.02%1.45%1.23%3.91%4.05%3.14%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.06%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%1.85%

Drawdowns

FMAO vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAO drawdown since its inception was -62.88%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAO and AGM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FMAO vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 8.59%. This indicates that FMAO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FMAO vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
45.16M
384.79M
(FMAO) Total Revenue
(AGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FMAO vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
62.2%
24.5%
(FMAO) Gross Margin
(AGM) Gross Margin
FMAO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.07M and revenue of 45.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 94.32M and revenue of 384.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

FMAO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.31M and revenue of 45.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 64.81M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

FMAO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 6.95M and revenue of 45.16M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 49.65M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.