PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO) and Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio (GRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLVI.NEO
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
7.35%33.34%5.08%
GRO.TO
Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio
-1.72%11.09%15.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLVI.NEO achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than GRO.TO's -1.72% return.


FLVI.NEO

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
7.35%
6M
13.01%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRO.TO

1D
0.68%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
0.69%
1Y
13.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLVI.NEO
FLVI.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLVI.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVI.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVI.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVI.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVI.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GRO.TO
GRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO) and Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio (GRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLVI.NEOGRO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.94

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

1.35

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.62

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.43

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.11

5.43

+4.68

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLVI.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the GRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVI.NEO and GRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLVI.NEOGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.94

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.94

1.09

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between FLVI.NEO and GRO.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

FLVI.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, which matches GRO.TO's 2.36% yield.


Drawdowns

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVI.NEO drawdown since its inception was -11.90%, smaller than the maximum GRO.TO drawdown of -12.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVI.NEO and GRO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVI.NEOGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-12.96%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-9.16%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-5.17%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.55%

-1.36%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.40%

+0.28%

Volatility

FLVI.NEO vs. GRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO) is 4.40%, while Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio (GRO.TO) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that FLVI.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLVI.NEOGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.42%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.50%

6.85%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

14.94%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

12.43%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

12.43%

+0.58%