PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
33.25%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%3.87%
EXCS.L
iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.84%26.13%5.55%10.95%-8.31%2.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRK.L achieves a 33.25% return, which is significantly higher than EXCS.L's 10.84% return.


FLRK.L

1D
9.23%
1M
-10.91%
YTD
33.25%
6M
64.38%
1Y
132.77%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*

EXCS.L

1D
4.07%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
10.84%
6M
20.32%
1Y
44.02%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EXCS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EXCS.L
EXCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRK.LEXCS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.25

2.50

+1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.56

3.14

+1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.46

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.31

3.73

+2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.10

14.07

+10.04

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.25, which is higher than the EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRK.L and EXCS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRK.LEXCS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25

2.50

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.72

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between FLRK.L and EXCS.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLRK.L nor EXCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, which is greater than EXCS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and EXCS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRK.LEXCS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.57%

-17.51%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.18%

-11.81%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.91%

-8.10%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.35%

-4.97%

-15.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

3.13%

+2.42%

Volatility

FLRK.L vs. EXCS.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L) at 8.05%. This indicates that FLRK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLRK.LEXCS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

8.05%

+8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.15%

13.97%

+13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.15%

17.53%

+13.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.21%

14.63%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

14.63%

+11.50%