FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L).
FLRK.L and CSKR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLRK.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. CSKR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010. Both FLRK.L and CSKR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.25% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
CSKR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) | 33.38% | 85.24% | -21.31% | 13.76% | -20.02% | -7.37% | 40.01% | 9.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
FLRK.L is traded in GBP, while CSKR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSKR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLRK.L having a 33.25% return and CSKR.L slightly higher at 33.38%.
FLRK.L
- 1D
- 9.23%
- 1M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- 33.25%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 132.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
CSKR.L
- 1D
- 9.88%
- 1M
- -10.58%
- YTD
- 33.38%
- 6M
- 64.96%
- 1Y
- 137.17%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CSKR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLRK.L
CSKR.L
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRK.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.25 | 4.26 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.56 | 4.55 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.65 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.31 | 6.45 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 24.45 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRK.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25 | 4.26 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRK.L and CSKR.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLRK.L nor CSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum CSKR.L drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and CSKR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRK.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.57% | -50.88% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.18% | -23.16% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.88% | -49.26% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.91% | -15.38% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -21.80% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 5.75% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FLRK.L vs. CSKR.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) have volatilities of 16.59% and 17.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLRK.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.59% | 17.09% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.15% | 27.92% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.15% | 32.10% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 25.82% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 27.44% | -1.31% |