FLCH vs. VNQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ).
FLCH and VNQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. VNQ is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. Both FLCH and VNQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLCH vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCH vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.08% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.06% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 0.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 3.06% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -14.01%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- -4.94%
- 10Y*
- —
VNQ
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCH vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
VNQ
FLCH vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.29 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.17 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.26 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and VNQ is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLCH vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than VNQ's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.51% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.86% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and VNQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -73.07% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.88% | -9.35% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.06% | -34.48% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.80% | -8.01% | -25.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -13.71% | -16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 3.22% | +2.80% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 4.84%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.84% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 9.38% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 16.37% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 18.80% | +10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 20.70% | +7.35% |