FKGRX vs. TZINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX).
FKGRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 1, 1948. TZINX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | -4.72% | 15.38% | 17.96% | 27.54% | -25.32% | 21.61% | 30.71% | 32.08% | -3.37% | 26.31% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 1.94% | 27.85% | 0.73% | 14.45% | -14.31% | -1.44% | 1.70% | 7.58% | -9.18% | 12.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKGRX achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than TZINX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FKGRX has outperformed TZINX with an annualized return of 12.98%, while TZINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.
FKGRX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -4.72%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
TZINX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than TZINX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKGRX vs. TZINX — Risk / Return Rank
FKGRX
TZINX
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKGRX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.00 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 2.68 | -1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.80 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 10.77 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKGRX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.00 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.35 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.39 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKGRX and TZINX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Dividend Comparison
FKGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than TZINX's 4.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | 15.08% | 14.37% | 8.34% | 6.26% | 10.49% | 9.19% | 7.97% | 5.75% | 1.65% | 2.38% | 3.26% | 3.88% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 4.90% | 4.00% | 5.43% | 3.68% | 3.47% | 2.24% | 2.12% | 4.43% | 4.55% | 2.82% | 1.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKGRX drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, which is greater than TZINX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKGRX and TZINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKGRX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -36.06% | -15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.42% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.22% | -29.60% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.52% | -29.60% | -2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -6.21% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -7.52% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.19% | +0.90% |
Volatility
FKGRX vs. TZINX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) at 4.79%. This indicates that FKGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TZINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKGRX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.79% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 7.94% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 11.59% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 11.81% | +7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 11.33% | +8.17% |