FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO).

FINN.NEO and QMVP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FINN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 19, 2023. QMVP.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2026.

Performance

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF	-2.04%
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	-6.64%

Returns By Period

FINN.NEO

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 37.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMVP.TO

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINN.NEO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.

FINN.NEO

Fidelity Global Innovators ETF

QMVP.TO

Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF

Return for Risk

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINN.NEO

FINN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 80
FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FINN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FINN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FINN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FINN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FINN.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FINN.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.58	-1.33	+2.91

Correlation

The correlation between FINN.NEO and QMVP.TO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

FINN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

	TTM
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF	0.00%
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	0.13%

Drawdowns

FINN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINN.NEO and QMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINN.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.66%	-12.77%	-12.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-8.10%	+3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-6.31%	+2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FINN.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	22.65%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.01%	22.65%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	22.65%	-0.64%