FIIAX vs. ATGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class A (FIIAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX).
FIIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 12, 2004. ATGAX is managed by Aquila. It was launched on Jul 22, 1994.
Performance
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class A | 6.23% | 7.21% | 16.96% | 14.68% | -15.04% | 24.94% | 18.34% | 23.32% | -15.21% | 20.32% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 3.21% | 16.18% | 8.65% | 12.37% | -15.44% | 21.06% | 7.40% | 35.52% | -11.36% | 10.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIAX achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than ATGAX's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FIIAX has outperformed ATGAX with an annualized return of 10.85%, while ATGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.
FIIAX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 24.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIIAX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIAX
ATGAX
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class A (FIIAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.83 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.05 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 8.49 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.37 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIAX and ATGAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
FIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than ATGAX's 5.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class A | 6.65% | 6.21% | 6.89% | 2.59% | 5.68% | 18.94% | 1.12% | 3.21% | 10.53% | 7.60% | 8.69% | 4.74% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 5.56% | 5.74% | 28.32% | 0.00% | 10.25% | 31.85% | 4.65% | 8.98% | 14.76% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum ATGAX drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIAX and ATGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -64.74% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -7.70% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.25% | -22.91% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -40.44% | -1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -3.89% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -10.39% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.00% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FIIAX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class A (FIIAX) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) at 5.92%. This indicates that FIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIIAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 5.92% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 11.63% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 19.30% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 18.60% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 19.27% | +1.70% |