PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLSX vs. MAANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Mutual of America Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHLSX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund
-0.82%12.15%6.93%9.70%-14.89%5.37%20.55%
MAANX
Mutual of America Aggressive Allocation Fund
-3.18%16.23%12.16%12.48%-15.74%14.83%1,117.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLSX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than MAANX's -3.18% return.


FHLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
1.11%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*

MAANX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FHLSX vs. MAANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLSX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than MAANX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FHLSX vs. MAANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLSX
FHLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FHLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MAANX
MAANX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MAANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAANX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MAANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAANX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and Mutual of America Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHLSXMAANXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.03

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

1.57

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

0.68

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.53

3.22

+5.31

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the MAANX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLSX and MAANX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHLSXMAANXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.03

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.37

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.15

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FHLSX and MAANX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Dividend Comparison

FHLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than MAANX's 11.04% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FHLSX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund
3.00%2.95%2.89%2.78%3.72%2.71%1.73%
MAANX
Mutual of America Aggressive Allocation Fund
11.04%10.68%7.81%4.21%12.49%7.60%0.00%

Drawdowns

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLSX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum MAANX drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLSX and MAANX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLSXMAANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-29.21%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-10.72%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

-22.63%

+3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-8.10%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-5.72%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.78%

-1.65%

Volatility

FHLSX vs. MAANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) is 2.64%, while Mutual of America Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAANX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that FHLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FHLSXMAANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.41%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

8.14%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.70%

15.51%

-8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

16.31%

-9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

385.95%

-378.98%