FGRTX vs. FSPCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) and FSPCX (Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FGRTX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSPCX is a Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX returned 16.84%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for FSPCX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGRTX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSPCX.

Performance

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRTX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FSPCX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX has outperformed FSPCX with an annualized return of 16.84%, while FSPCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.57% annualized return.

FGRTX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 9.28%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 16.41%
• 10Y*: 16.84%

FSPCX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -1.93%
• 1Y: -2.13%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 12.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	9.28%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%	31.07%	-7.44%	16.98%
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio	-1.11%	3.45%	28.44%	12.98%	7.75%	29.26%	0.00%	30.06%	-11.99%	15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRTX and FSPCX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1998	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between FGRTX and FSPCX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGRTX vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FSPCX

FSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGRTX	FSPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	-0.05	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	0.03	+3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.00	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	-0.08	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.42	-0.16	+14.58

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FSPCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRTX and FSPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRTX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, smaller than the maximum FSPCX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRTX and FSPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRTX	FSPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.17%	-69.48%	+13.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-9.98%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.51%	-11.69%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-16.65%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.18%	-43.68%	+8.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-5.80%	+4.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.71%	-9.70%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	5.01%	-2.99%

Volatility

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) is 4.34%, while Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that FGRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRTX	FSPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	5.06%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	10.96%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	15.48%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	17.48%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.15%	20.12%	-1.97%

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRTX vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison

FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FSPCX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.56%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio	4.76%	3.35%	8.72%	8.48%	0.74%	8.40%	8.80%	6.90%	32.69%	12.52%	2.81%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRTX and FSPCX in my portfolio?

FGRTX and FSPCX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRTX or FSPCX?

FSPCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FGRTX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRTX dropped -56.17% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.