PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRSX vs. DBFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund (DBFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
-0.72%5.61%6.71%8.04%-5.85%3.73%0.45%6.71%0.38%3.54%
DBFRX
DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund
0.03%6.75%8.10%10.77%-2.23%4.27%2.74%6.74%0.05%3.71%

Returns By Period


FFRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
3.41%

DBFRX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FFRSX and DBFRX have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Return for Risk

FFRSX vs. DBFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRSX
FFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DBFRX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund (DBFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFRSXDBFRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.21

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFRSXDBFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

Correlation

The correlation between FFRSX and DBFRX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Dividend Comparison

FFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than DBFRX's 5.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
5.61%6.38%6.95%6.88%4.15%2.92%3.37%4.62%4.41%3.68%3.76%3.71%
DBFRX
DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund
5.78%6.99%8.04%8.42%5.14%3.24%4.04%5.29%4.89%3.75%3.50%3.82%

Drawdowns

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRSXDBFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

Volatility

FFRSX vs. DBFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFRSXDBFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%