FEIM vs. INOD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) and Innodata Inc. (INOD).

Performance

FEIM vs. INOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEIM vs. INOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEIM Frequency Electronics, Inc.	-17.79%	190.71%	83.20%	80.95%	-29.36%	-9.19%	7.64%	-3.68%	13.25%	-13.33%
INOD Innodata Inc.	-24.20%	28.92%	385.50%	174.54%	-49.92%	11.70%	364.91%	-24.00%	10.29%	-44.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FEIM : $431.98M INOD : $1.37B
EPS FEIM : $0.74 INOD : $0.91
PE Ratio FEIM : 59.82 INOD : 42.42
PEG Ratio FEIM : 0.26 INOD : 0.01
PS Ratio FEIM : 6.35 INOD : 5.42K
Total Revenue (TTM) FEIM : $67.82M INOD : $251.70K
Gross Profit (TTM) FEIM : $25.74M INOD : $99.50K
EBITDA (TTM) FEIM : $6.83M INOD : $33.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEIM achieves a -17.79% return, which is significantly higher than INOD's -24.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FEIM has underperformed INOD with an annualized return of 18.83%, while INOD has yielded a comparatively higher 32.88% annualized return.

FEIM

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -11.85%
• YTD: -17.79%
• 6M: 30.52%
• 1Y: 182.81%
• 3Y*: 90.91%
• 5Y*: 37.73%
• 10Y*: 18.83%

INOD

• 1D: 12.10%
• 1M: -12.57%
• YTD: -24.20%
• 6M: -49.89%
• 1Y: 7.58%
• 3Y*: 65.37%
• 5Y*: 42.30%
• 10Y*: 32.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FEIM vs. INOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEIM

FEIM Risk / Return Rank: 91
FEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 94

INOD

INOD Risk / Return Rank: 46
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEIM vs. INOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEIM	INOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	0.09	+2.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	0.77	+1.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.09	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.60	0.05	+5.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.14	0.11	+14.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEIM vs. INOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the INOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEIM and INOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEIM	INOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	0.09	+2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.43	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.39	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.10	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FEIM and INOD is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FEIM vs. INOD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEIM nor INOD has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEIM Frequency Electronics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	5.40%	9.13%
INOD Innodata Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FEIM vs. INOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEIM drawdown since its inception was -93.47%, roughly equal to the maximum INOD drawdown of -95.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEIM and INOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEIM	INOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.47%	-95.47%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.02%	-63.03%	+30.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.32%	-74.44%	+17.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.46%	-74.44%	+11.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.59%	-58.56%	+31.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.41%	-60.25%	-3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.08%	30.29%	-17.21%

Volatility

FEIM vs. INOD - Volatility Comparison

Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) has a higher volatility of 25.72% compared to Innodata Inc. (INOD) at 20.66%. This indicates that FEIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEIM	INOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.72%	20.66%	+5.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.38%	56.42%	+3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.21%	86.43%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.20%	98.02%	-42.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.25%	84.00%	-34.75%

Financials

FEIM vs. INOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Frequency Electronics, Inc. and Innodata Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FEIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frequency Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.63M and revenue of 16.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.2%.

INOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a gross profit of -72.28M and revenue of -179.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.

FEIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frequency Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 16.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

INOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innodata Inc. reported an operating income of -28.12M and revenue of -179.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.

FEIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frequency Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 1.57M and revenue of 16.89M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

INOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a net income of 8.83M and revenue of -179.04M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.