PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN.L vs. CAPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDN.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
-13.42%2.35%32.65%45.94%-40.28%5.91%
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
1.04%-0.65%12.99%2.23%0.10%19.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN.L achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly lower than CAPS.L's 1.04% return.


FDN.L

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-13.42%
6M
-16.08%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*

CAPS.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.04%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPS.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN.L
FDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDN.LCAPS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

0.16

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.31

0.31

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.16

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.12

0.44

-0.32

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is comparable to the CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN.L and CAPS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDN.LCAPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.36

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between FDN.L and CAPS.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDN.L nor CAPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN.L drawdown since its inception was -46.90%, which is greater than CAPS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN.L and CAPS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDN.LCAPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.90%

-22.86%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.87%

-7.99%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.41%

-15.14%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-10.01%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

2.74%

+5.47%

Volatility

FDN.L vs. CAPS.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) at 2.87%. This indicates that FDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDN.LCAPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

2.87%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

6.74%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

12.44%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

19.50%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

19.50%

+5.10%