PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO).

FCUQ.TO and XMS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCUQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2019. XMS.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2016. Both FCUQ.TO and XMS.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCUQ.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF		-5.25%4.67%32.89%20.05%-11.48%31.73%13.51%24.22%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-4.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%1.81%22.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUQ.TO achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than XMS.TO's -4.17% return.

FCUQ.TO

1D
2.70%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-5.25%
6M
-7.98%
1Y
0.81%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
—

XMS.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-6.72%
1Y
-5.06%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with FCUQ.TO:
FCUQ.TO vs. VDY.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FCUV.TOFCUQ.TO vs. HULC.TOFCUQ.TO vs. CNCL.TOFCUQ.TO vs. ETSX.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FBTC.TOFCUQ.TO vs. FCID.TO
Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. XDU.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TO

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMS.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.

FCUQ.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Return for Risk

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCUQ.TO
FCUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FCUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FCUQ.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

-0.40

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

-0.46

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.93

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

-0.65

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.45

-2.33

+2.78

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUQ.TO and XMS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FCUQ.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

-0.40

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.41

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.51

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between FCUQ.TO and XMS.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than XMS.TO's 1.25% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCUQ.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF		0.76%0.73%0.77%0.88%1.04%0.79%1.15%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.25%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%

Drawdowns

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.36%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUQ.TO and XMS.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FCUQ.TOXMS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-36.48%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-8.50%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-19.23%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-6.91%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-4.28%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.35%

+1.73%

Volatility

FCUQ.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) at 3.08%. This indicates that FCUQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FCUQ.TOXMS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

3.08%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

6.77%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

12.14%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

12.12%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

14.76%

+2.65%