FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity China Special Situations plc (FCSS.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L).
CUKX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010.
Performance
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSS.L Fidelity China Special Situations plc | -6.14% | 40.12% | 8.61% | -9.30% | -21.25% | -17.53% | 68.64% | 24.10% | -18.81% | 39.79% |
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 5.58% | 25.78% | 9.30% | 7.72% | 4.97% | 17.48% | -11.28% | 17.23% | -9.05% | 12.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSS.L achieves a -6.14% return, which is significantly lower than CUKX.L's 5.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCSS.L having a 9.76% annualized return and CUKX.L not far behind at 9.37%.
FCSS.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -13.59%
- 1Y
- 9.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
CUKX.L
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank
FCSS.L
CUKX.L
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Special Situations plc (FCSS.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSS.L | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 1.88 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 2.38 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.74 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 10.57 | -8.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSS.L | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.88 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 1.02 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.62 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSS.L and CUKX.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison
FCSS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSS.L Fidelity China Special Situations plc | 3.18% | 2.99% | 2.87% | 2.96% | 2.29% | 1.50% | 1.11% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.06% | 1.06% | 0.91% |
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSS.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than CUKX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSS.L and CUKX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSS.L | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -34.50% | -28.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.94% | -10.55% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.76% | -12.88% | -44.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.98% | -34.50% | -28.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.54% | -4.40% | -31.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.84% | -4.40% | -20.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.94% | 2.36% | +3.58% |
Volatility
FCSS.L vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity China Special Situations plc (FCSS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) at 5.35%. This indicates that FCSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCSS.L | CUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 5.35% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 8.43% | +7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 12.96% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 12.66% | +15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 15.05% | +10.92% |