FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust (FCR-UN.TO) and IGM Financial Inc. (IGM.TO).
Performance
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCR-UN.TO First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust | 9.92% | 17.08% | 16.59% | -3.27% | -7.64% | 42.71% | -30.44% | 13.36% | -4.95% | 4.62% |
IGM.TO IGM Financial Inc. | 7.23% | 40.98% | 38.87% | -1.67% | -12.00% | 39.17% | -0.01% | 27.74% | -25.09% | 21.99% |
Fundamentals
FCR-UN.TO:
CA$4.38B
IGM.TO:
CA$15.71B
FCR-UN.TO:
CA$4.99
IGM.TO:
CA$4.64
FCR-UN.TO:
4.13
IGM.TO:
14.28
FCR-UN.TO:
0.00
IGM.TO:
2.67
FCR-UN.TO:
5.91
IGM.TO:
4.11
FCR-UN.TO:
0.91
IGM.TO:
1.76
FCR-UN.TO:
CA$743.81M
IGM.TO:
CA$3.82B
FCR-UN.TO:
CA$470.51M
IGM.TO:
CA$1.88B
FCR-UN.TO:
CA$447.26M
IGM.TO:
CA$1.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCR-UN.TO achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than IGM.TO's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FCR-UN.TO has underperformed IGM.TO with an annualized return of 4.37%, while IGM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.
FCR-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
IGM.TO
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 32.02%
- 1Y
- 54.82%
- 3Y*
- 23.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCR-UN.TO
IGM.TO
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust (FCR-UN.TO) and IGM Financial Inc. (IGM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCR-UN.TO | IGM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 3.05 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 5.28 | -1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | 18.11 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCR-UN.TO | IGM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.54 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCR-UN.TO and IGM.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than IGM.TO's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCR-UN.TO First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.97% | 4.70% | 5.09% | 5.63% | 3.43% | 2.29% | 6.38% | 3.47% | 4.56% | 4.15% | 4.16% | 4.69% |
IGM.TO IGM Financial Inc. | 2.55% | 3.64% | 4.91% | 6.43% | 5.96% | 4.94% | 6.53% | 6.04% | 7.26% | 5.10% | 5.92% | 6.37% |
Drawdowns
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.96%, smaller than the maximum IGM.TO drawdown of -68.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCR-UN.TO and IGM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCR-UN.TO | IGM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.96% | -68.35% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -10.75% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -32.58% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.80% | -47.65% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -4.37% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -19.62% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.13% | -0.71% |
Volatility
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust (FCR-UN.TO) is 5.02%, while IGM Financial Inc. (IGM.TO) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that FCR-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCR-UN.TO | IGM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 8.31% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 19.03% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 24.04% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 20.85% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 22.37% | -0.01% |
Financials
FCR-UN.TO vs. IGM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust and IGM Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities